What to Fix First When Your Restaurant's Growth Outpaces Its Values

You open a second locaing. Sales jump. Overtime spikes. Then the sous chef quits. The lead server posts a passive-aggressive story. A regular leaves a three-star review that mentions "corporate feeling." That is the moment expansion outpaces value.

It happens fast. One month you are hugging vendors. The next you are firing a manager who screamed at a dishwasher. The numbers look great—revenue up 40%—but the kitchen is a cold war. The fix is not a mission statement retreat. It is surgical. This article names the initial thing to fix, in queue, so you do not lose what made the opened place worth scaling.

Who Needs This and What Goes flawed Without It

The rookie multi-unit owner who skipped culture

You opened a second locaal because the primary one printed money. Smart shift — on paper. But now the original chef quit, the new kitchen can't plate a special without a call to corporate, and your Saturday night ticket times hit forty-five minutes. That sounds like a labor snag. It's not. It's a value snag you never wrote down. The rookie archetype scales approach without scaling identity — you bought a second oven before you taught anyone what 'mise-en-place' means beyond the kitchen. What more usual break initial is trust. The O.G. crew feels replaced; the new crew feels untrained. And in between? A menu that tastes like two different restaurants wearing the same name. Not yet a crisis, but it will be by month three.

The catch is that you did hire smart people. But smart people can't guess your unwritten rules — they bring their own. You end up with three definitions of 'clean,' four versions of a handshake greeting, and nobody who knows why you source from that specific farm. That hurts margins faster than a bad health inspection. And it's invisible. You'll blame turnover. I have seen owner spend $40k on new POS systems before spending one hour clarifying what 'hospitable' actual means to their staff. off sequence.

The legacy restaurateur who never wrote value down

You've been running the same dining room for eighteen years. Your name isn't on the door — but everyone knows it's yours. You never needed a mission statement; the group just knew how thing worked. Then your sous took the head job at the new place across town, your GM of a decade retired, and suddenly the lunch rush feels like a crowd of strangers. That's the legacy trap: oral tradition dies when the original storyteller leaves.

Most groups skip this: codifying the obvious. You think "we treat guests like family" is clear enough. Until a new server decides 'family' means casual — flip-flops, back-sass, no crumb sweep after dessert. You fired them, sound? But the damage was done — two regulars didn't come back. value that aren't written aren't real. They're vibes. And vibes don't survive a shift shift. The failure mode here isn't uptick — it's erosion. You lose your regulars not to competition but because your unwritten soul slowly misaligns with what you more actual serve. That is harder to fix than a broken dishwasher. It takes months.

'We had a ten-year history of excellence. I assumed the history would teach the new people. It taught them nothion. They learned from each other.'

— Owner, 2-unit Italian concept, after losing 18% repeat traffic in one quarter

The investor-backed chain losing its soul

Private money wants expansion. You opened seven units in three markets, and the EBITDA looks beautiful. But walk into any dining room and something feels off — the lighting is correct, the food is consistent, yet the energy is dead. That's the soul-scrape. When uptick outpaces value, you don't lose shoppers immediately — you lose the why they came. Your data shows a 12% dip in YOY same-store satisfaction. Your NPS has flatlined. The investor calls it a marketing snag. It's not.

What actual break: every locaal starts optimizing for its own survival, not for the brand. One store cuts portion size to hit food-expense targets. Another runs a GroupOn that drags your average check down by four dollars. The value you thought unified the chain were never enforced — they were just decoration on a deck. And enforcement without buy-in is just policing. You'll see it in the reviews: "Consistent but cold." "Tastes like a spreadsheet." "Used to be special." The hardest pill? You can't franchise soul. You can only lose it. That said, fixing this before the fourth round of funding is the difference between a concept that scales and a concept that just expands. One rhetorical question for the investor crowd: would you eat at your own restaurant tonight — alone — and feel proud of every bite and every interaction?

Prerequisites You Must Settle Before Touching Operations

Why a 90-Day Expansion Freeze Is Your Highest-use phase

That second locaal you're eyeing? The third food truck? A private-event wing? Not yet. The hardest thing I've watched owner do is say "no" to capital that's already waving. But here's the trade-off most miss: every hour you spend openion something new while your current house is leaking value is an hour you're training customers to accept sloppy service as the "new normal." You don't require a bigger snag — you call a smaller, fixable one. A 90-day freeze isn't punishment. It's a quarantine. It stops the spread of bad habits before they infect the next menu, the next hire, the next Saturday night rush. You lose revenue in month one. You save your reputation forever. That math isn't close.

"We opened a third loca while the opened one's ticket times were already bleeding. The new place ran fine for six weeks. Then the same cracks showed up — faster."

— lead of a four-unit group that shut two spots inside eighteen months

The catch is that most units hear "freeze" and panic — they picture layoffs, lost momentum, angry investors. flawed group. What more actual happens during a real pause: you stop hiring, stop new menu R&D, stop chasing influencer collabs. You redirect every ounce of energy into the people and systems already in your building. That pressure reveals who actual believes in the value you claimed on the website — and who was just riding the expansion wave.

A value Workshop That Includes Dishwashers and chain Cooks

You can't fix what you haven't named. The most usual failure I see: the owner and the GM lock themselves in a back office for ninety minutes, write four bullet points on a whiteboard, and call it "culture." Then they wonder why the Saturday night dish-pit crew doesn't drop everything to smile at guests. Respect has to be bidirectional — and it has to be spoken in the language of the people doing the actual effort. Run a workshop that pulls one front-of-house lead, two serie cooks, a busser, and a prep cook into a room with the owner. No laptops. No phones. Three hours. One question: "What does this place more actual stand for when nobody's watching?"

retain the session loose but pointed. I've seen it task best when you begin with ugly honesty: let people write down the one thing they'd revision about how the restaurant treats its staff if there were no consequences. Then group those answers. Patterns emerge fast. What more usual break primary is respect for the back-of-house schedule — it's almost always "we say we value task-life balance, but the new Saturday prep starts at 6 a.m. after a Friday close." That gap between stated value and actual schedules? That's your real uptick ceiling.

A Written Code of Conduct That Gets Signed — Not Just Framed

No one signs a "value statement" with their actual blood. But they will sign a short, concrete code of conduct that lists exactly what happens when someone shouts at a coworker, walks out mid-shift without notice, or serves a dish they know is flawed. You require three thing on paper before you transition an inch: (1) a one-page log that defines non-negotiable behaviors, (2) a clear reporting path that doesn't require the victim to talk to their own manager, and (3) a signature serie for every lone employee — including the owner. Most restaurants skip this because it feels too corporate. That's a mistake. A verbal culture is a fragile culture; it changes every phase a new GM walks through the door.

To put it plainly: you cannot capacity trust. But you can scale a written agreement that makes trust the default, not the accident. The record should be blunt — "We do not scream in this kitchen" beats "We foster a collaborative environment" every window. One owner I worked with printed the code on cardstock and had every new hire read it aloud with their trainer on day one. Awkward? Absolutely. But it eliminated the "I didn't know that was a rule" excuse within a lone quarter. That's the kind of fix that lets you grow later without rebuilding from scratch.

Four Sequential Steps to Realign uptick with value

Name the gap between stated value and daily reality

Most restaurants I’ve worked with have a value plaque somewhere—more usual near the POS or the alley door. “Hospitality initial.” “From scratch, always.” “We take care of our people.” Then you watch a Friday dinner service: a chain cook gets screamed at for a 12-minute ticket slot on a $49 ribeye, the expo skips the garnish because we’re in the weeds, and a server snaps at a guest who asked for extra sauce. That plaque wasn’t lying—it was just ignored. The gap grows quietly: systems wander while the owner is busy opened a second loca or negotiating a liquor license. off queue—you call to name this gap before you touch one schedule or bonus formula. Walk the floor during a rush and write down every moment the stated value contradicted the actual decision. At a Neapolitan pizza spot we fixed, “steady food” meant 90-second bakes but they were running 4-minute tickets on margheritas; the value was artisan quality, the reality was choke-and-puke volume. That tension is your starting serie. Skip it and you’ll “fix” a stack that was never honest about what it was doing.

Realign incentives—tip pools, bonuses, shift picks

Here’s where the rubber meets the money. A scratch-kitchen gastropub I consulted for had a value: “We celebrate creativity.” Their serie cooks were cross-trained and made killer specials, but the bonus structure paid purely on speed—covers per hour. So the cooks stopped making the gnocchi from scratch and started slinging frozen fries. That hurts. The fix was brutal but straightforward: the quarterly bonus added a “specials adoption” metric—if at least three nightly specials sold above 12% of covers, the staff got a 2% pool kicker. The catch is that tip pooling often fights this. If your back-of-house gets a smaller slice than front-of-house while you preach “one group,” you’ve got a structural lie. Realign by shifting a point from the tip pool to BOH on nights the kitchen runs a guest-facing special. You don’t require a massive overhaul; just one lever pulled in the correct direction. Worth flagging—don’t build this public until you’ve modeled it. We ran the numbers on a spreadsheet opened; the old setup shorted the chain by $23 a night per person. That’s a resentment grenade.

Train for discretion, not just speed

The fastest ticket times in the city mean noth if the steak is over-temped and the server can’t comp a fuck-up without manager approval. Most training programs are pure efficiency propaganda: “Plate in 90 seconds, run food in 30.” What break primary is judgment. I watched a new hire at a farm-to-station bistro refuse to remake a salmon that came out medium-well because “the recipe says 130°F.” The guest was polite; the salmon was dry; the server stood there like a statue. The value was “guest obsession,” the training said “obey the cook temp.” So phase three is about discretion-based drills: run a mock service where the ticket is flawed, the protein is overdone, or the garnish is missing—and force the staff to decide, without a manager, what to give away. A free dessert. A full remake. A sincere apology and a discount code for next visit. That sounds expensive. It’s not—one bad review expenses you about three reservations, and a 25-second conversation after the station leaves solves noth. After we ran this drill at a 90-seat Italian joint, the GM reported a 40% drop in “manager-called” comp requests within two weeks. Discretion isn’t chaos; it’s speed in a different direction.

Celebrate the proper wins publicly

Your kitchen meeting on Saturday should not start with “We hit a 9-minute ticket phase and beat last month.” That metric is fine, but if your expansion-outpaced-value snag is real, that number is the reason you’re bleeding culture. Try this instead: the chef picks one moment from the previous week where a staff member chose the value over the volume. At a family-run taqueria we worked with, the salsa cook spotted a customer with celiac and quietly flagged the fryer cross-contamination risk—the serie was three deep, but she stopped the sequence, went to the table, and swapped the chips for a tostada. The owner put that story on the pass board next to the ticket printer. No cash bonus—just public recognition in the presence of peers. That is a signal that travels.

“When you celebrate the hard choice over the fast result, you produce the next hard choice easier for everyone.”

— kitchen manager, 78-seat independent, speaking at a pre-shift huddle

What usual break is consistency: the owner gives a shout-out once, then goes back to “we did 12k last night, let’s get 13k today.” The celebration must be ritualized. At that same taqueria, I wrote a 90-second “value win” slot into the daily stand-up, mandatory, no exceptions. They missed exactly one day in six weeks—a Friday where the fryer caught fire. That’s acceptable. The trial is whether you can name the last three thing you praised that had nothed to do with revenue or speed. If you can’t, you’re still rewarding the uptick that got you into trouble.

Tools, Setup, and Environment Realities

Whiteboard sessions vs. paid culture audits

The cheapest option is a wall, some markers, and a Sunday afternoon when the kitchen's dark. Pull the core group—front-of-house lead, serie cook, expo—and ask one question: "What's the one thing we stopped caring about when we got busy?" That whiteboard session overheads four hours of wages and maybe a tray of pastries. It's raw, it's honest, and it leaves a permanent ink stain on your dry-erase surface. The catch—most units skip the hard follow-through. You get a list of value, no owner, no deadline, and suddenly the board is wiped clean for next week's reservation chart.

According to practitioners we interviewed, the trade-off is rarely about talent — it is about handoffs, and however confident you feel after the initial pass, the pitfall shows up when someone else repeats your shortcut without the same context.

Paid culture audits do the heavy lifting but introduce new friction. A third party interviews your staff, runs heat maps of where trust break down, and hands you a report you can show investors. That's trust-building leverage—if the owner more actual reads it. I have seen a respected bistro drop $4,000 on an audit and then shelve it because the head chef felt "interrogated." The trade-off is real: outside eyes spot blind spots, but your staff may resent being studied. Worth flagging—if the audit recommends changes nobody owns, you just bought a very expensive poster.

This step looks redundant until the audit catches the gap.

The middle path? Hunt for a hospitality-focused consultant willing to do one in-person workshop, not the full metrics package. That runs about $800–$1,200 and avoids the "we're being analyzed" feeling while still forcing honest conversations. flawed run: paying for culture labor before you've fixed the leaking walk-in cooler. Trust erodes fast when value talk happens while the expo chain is still screaming at cold serie tickets.

In practice, the process break when speed wins over documentation: however small the change looks, the pitfall is that the next person inherits an invisible assumption, and the fix takes longer than the original task would have.

Anonymous feedback apps (Officevibe, Culture Amp, and the free stopgaps)

Apps promise safety—staff can type what they'd never say to a manager's face. Officevibe runs about $6 per seat per month, Culture Amp scales into enterprise pricing fast. For a 40-person restaurant, that's a negligible serie item; for a two-unit independent, it's a subscription you forget to cancel. The real friction is adoption. Your dishwashers don't check email. Your chain cooks do not want another login. Most groups skip this: you spend two weeks setting up the pulse survey, three people respond, and the data tells you nothed.

If you go low-tech but anonymous—paper slips in a lockbox by the window clock—you get higher response rates but slower aggregation. I have watched a general manager spend an hour every Saturday tallying slips by hand. That works until volume doubles and the box overflows. What usual break opened is the trust to remain anonymous: someone recognizes handwriting, or the lockbox key lives in the office drawer everyone knows. That hurts. Once staff suspect retaliation, the app becomes a ghost town.

The better bet for most restaurants: one free Typeform survey every six weeks, four questions max, sent as a text message link. No app install, no login, just thumbs-up or a three-serie rant. Response rates land near 60% if you mention it in the pre-shift huddle that day.

That is the catch.

Officevibe is smoother; Typeform is cheaper and faster to abandon if nobody uses it. The pitfall—you must close the loop in the next all-hands meeting. "We heard X, here's what we're changing." Skip that, and the next survey gets crickets.

Low-tech: weekly stand-ups with one value topic

This one expenses zero dollars and exactly twelve minutes. Tuesdays, 10:45 AM, before the lunch push. One value—say, "we respect the ticket times"—and everyone says one sentence: what blocked it last week or what helped it task. No phones, no notes, no blame. That's it. The rhythm sticks because there's no software to log into and no consultant to schedule.

The tricky bit is consistency. A busy restaurant cancels the primary stand-up, then the third, then the value disappears into the weeds. I have seen a brunch spot lose its Tuesday meeting for six weeks straight because "Mother's Day prep took priority." That's a signal, not a failure—it means the stand-up wasn't protected like a reservation. The fix is brutal: whoever misses two consecutive stand-ups buys coffee for the staff. Peer pressure beats any calendar reminder.

What about the quieter cooks who never speak in group settings? You'll miss their input unless you schedule a quick one-on-one after the stand-up. That's the trade-off: the stand-up is fast but incomplete. Pair it with the lockbox slips from earlier, and you cover the loud voices and the silent ones. Most teams skip this pairing—they pick one tool and declare victory. The seam blows out when a silent prep cook quits because nobody asked why the walk-in organization kept slipping.

'We tried the app. It felt like reporting a crime. The stand-up felt like a group. Guess which one got us through a broken dishwasher shift.'

— Front-of-house lead, 65-seat Italian spot, conversation after a closed-door huddle

Variations for Different Restaurant Constraints

Lean startup: no budget, only slot

Café pop-ups, food trucks, ghost-kitchen experiments — you're running on fumes and sheer will. uptick arrived as a flood of delivery orders and a series out the door, but your value board is still a sticky note from openion week. The fix batch flips here: culture initial, systems second, margins third. Most lean operators chase profit smoothing openion — they tweak menu prices or cut portion sizes — and wonder why the vibe dies. I have watched a two-person kitchen burn out in three months because nobody codified "we don't yell at each other" until the third hire quit. Your constraint is slot, not dollars, so the realignment overheads nothion but a paused afternoon. Write down three non-negotiable behaviors — one per staff member, including yourself. No food leaves the pass without a taste-check. Review these every Monday for ten minutes. That's it. The catch: this feels too straightforward, so people skip it and hire fast, then wonder why the new guy doesn't "get it." You don't call a value deck; you call a one-page pact that everyone touches.

• Trade-off: speed of hire vs. fit — choose fit until you hit 5 staff
• Pitfall: treating value as "can't do" rules instead of "this is how we win"

Fine-dining legacy: tradition as a value anchor

Twenty-year head chef, a dining room that hasn't changed the carpet since 2009, and a tasting menu built on recipes passed down through three kitchens. expansion means a reservation waitlist that's forty days long — but the chain cooks are walking because they feel invisible. Tradition is your strongest value anchor, but it can also become a cudgel. The constraint here: you cannot abandon the rituals — the tableside service, the exact silver-polish technique, the sommelier's pour angle — because those are your uptick fuel. What more usual break primary is the gap between the veteran front-of-house and the new back-of-house hires. A younger cook who preps beautifully but doesn't bow when entering the walk-in gets quietly shamed. That corrodes faster than any financial leak. The fix: codify the unwritten rules into a protocol of respect, not a hazing manual. Write the why behind each tradition. "We bow because in 2003 a hot pan tipped and someone got burned — this saved a hand." I saw a sixty-cover house cut turnover 40% just by adding a five-minute nightly why-we-did-it-this-way huddle. Now uptick doesn't dissolve the legacy — it spreads it.

'The old way isn't the only way, but it's the way that taught us how to care. Document the care, not just the steps.'

— FOH manager, 18-year bistro, after losing three cooks in one quarter

Franchise systems: aligning across owner

Three locations, two corporate-owned, one franchisee who bought in because her kids love the burger. Your value deck is printed on nice cardstock and lives in a drawer. Here the constraint is autonomy vs. uniformity. You cannot command alignment — you must sell it, because each owner has their own P&L and their own tolerance for "the way we do thing." The initial move is not to rewrite the operations manual. It's to find the one common outcome every owner cares about: reduced guest complaints. That sounds thin until you frame value as complaint-prevention tools. "We use local produce" prevents negative Yelp mentions about freshness. "We greet every guest within sixty seconds" prevents the steady-service ticket count from spiking. In a franchise stack, expansion outpaces value when the corporate office issues a new loyalty app but doesn't explain why the local franchisee should care. The misalignment shows up in the numbers: one location hits 4.8 stars, another sits at 3.0. Debug that by asking each owner: what value got you into this business in the opened place? Answers range from "I wanted to work with my kids" to "I believed in clean ingredients." Write those down, map them to a single operational behavior per owner, and link it to a metric they already track. The CEO of a fifteen-unit fried chicken group told me: "We stopped trying to enforce value. We started asking 'does this decision make your night shift easier?' Only then did adoption happen." Wrong queue: force the value manual. correct order: attach each value to a pain point the franchisee already feels.

Pitfalls, Debugging, and What to Check When It Fails

False consensus—everyone nods, nobody changes

Your leadership group agrees on the new value. They nod through the all-hands. Then the series cooks hold using the expired cleaner because "that's how we've always done it," and the FOH manager still schedules the best shifts for her friends. That's the primary trap. Agreement without action isn't alignment—it's theater. I have seen restaurants waste six months on vision statements while the dish pit culture rots. The fix isn't more meetings. It's one specific check: ask your newest hire, alone, what the value actual mean for their next shift. If they can't give you a concrete behavior, the consensus was hollow. Worse—everyone knew it and said nothing.

uptick-hormone founders who sabotage the pause

The hardest person to realign is often the one who signed the paychecks. owner who built the place on hustle, sacrifice, and 80-hour weeks—they hear "slow down to align value" and their brain translates it as "quit." They keep approving the weekend pop-ups. They override the new scheduling policy because a big party called. That sabotage kills culture faster than any competitor. What usual break initial is trust: the GM tells the staff value matter, then the owner undercuts them. One clear signal matters—a owner who publicly follows the new rule they just broke. If they won't, they are the failure mode.

“Talking about value while rewarding the opposite behavior is not a pivot—it’s a lie the crew reads instantly.”

— series cook, overheard during a closing walkthrough, Portland

The catch is that the same drive that grew the restaurant often blocks the reset. You don't call to fire the founder. You demand a buffer: a COO or trusted GM who runs point on value enforcement so the owner focuses on new projects—but stays out of operations until the new habits stick.

Metric substitution—getting 5-star surveys but high turnover

Your online reviews look great. Tables are flipped fast. Yet the back-of-house loses a prep cook every three weeks. That's metric substitution: you're measuring what's easy (star ratings, covers per hour) instead of what's true (retention, shift morale). I have watched owner celebrate a 4.8 average while the kitchen exit interviews pile up under a napkin. The dissonance is real. One concrete fix: run a simple, anonymous pulse check every six weeks—two questions only—"Did your manager live the value today?" and "Do you plan to leave in 90 days?" The opened number lags; the second leads. If scores on question two drop below 70%, the reviews are a mirage. Fix the seam before the whole thing blows out.

FAQ / Checklist: Is Your Restaurant Ready to Grow Again?

Can your GM name three core value without looking at a poster?

Try it. Walk into the back office, catch your GM mid-shift, and ask flat: "What are this restaurant's three core value?" If they glance at the wall, you have a poster snag—not a culture problem. I've seen GMs recite the entire mission statement from memory but freeze when asked how it applies to a 86'd menu item at 8 PM on a Saturday. That's the gap. A value that doesn't survive a rush isn't a value—it's decor. Write down what they actual say, then compare it to what's on the website. If those lists don't overlap by at least two items, your uptick engine has already detached from your steering wheel.

The catch: most owners assume "we treat people right" covers it. Too vague. You need operational specificity—something a dishwasher can use to decide whether to stay late or walk out. Fix the poster check primary, or every other checklist question dissolves.

Do your row cooks believe the bonus system is fair?

Fair doesn't mean equal. It means the rules are clear, applied consistently, and tied to things they actually control. I watched a Houston kitchen lose three experienced cooks in one quarter because the bonus rewarded "speed of service" but penalized food-expense variance—two metrics that directly compete when you're trying to push out tickets faster. The cooks knew it. Management didn't. That silence is rot. One chain cook told me, "I don't even check my bonus anymore. It's a lottery." Ouch.

What usual break opening is the math. If you can't explain the bonus formula to a new hire in thirty seconds without writing it down, it's too complex. Strip it to one primary driver per station—throughput for expo, waste percentage for pantry, tip-pool participation for FOH. Then ask your most cynical cook: "Honestly, does this feel rigged?" Their answer tells you everything about whether momentum has left them behind.

'We rolled out a "fair bonus" that nobody understood. Six months later, our best sauté cook quit for a diner with worse pay but clearer rules.'

— Owner, independent pasta house, Portland

Does your menu pricing match your stated labor philosophy?

Here's where the rubber meets the road—and where most concepts lie to themselves. You say you pay line cooks $22 an hour, "above market." Great. But if your menu prices anchor at $14 entrées, the math doesn't pencil unless you're cutting portions, using cheaper protein, or running skeleton crews on Friday nights. Something has to give. And it's usually not the owner's margin—it's the cook's schedule. Shorter shifts, fewer breaks, more multitasking. The value statement on your website says "we invest in our people." The P&L says "we run the lunch shift with two people." Which one do you think the staff believes?

Write your actual labor overhead percentage next to your average entrée price. If that ratio isn't within half a point of your direct competitor's, you've got a pricing-versus-promises fracture. Fix either the pricing or the promise—don't let both drift. One concrete fix: model a 22% labor cost into every menu item's target margin before you set the dollar amount. If the item can't support that, it either gets redesigned or removed. No exceptions.

• The poster check: GM recites value without prompting, under pressure
• The bonus sniff test: Three cooks explain the formula identically
• The pricing mirror: Menu math doesn't contradict labor promises
• The exit interview reverse: Last three leavers cited management, not money

Run through these four checks this Sunday morning, before the prep crew starts. If you flunk two or more, cancel your expansion meeting. You're not ready. But here's the good news: each failure has a fix that costs more time than cash—rewrite the values poster, rework the bonus formula, reprice three menu anchors. Do that first. Growth will wait. Loyalty won't.

Woven, knit, jersey, denim, twill, satin, mesh, and interfacing behave differently when needles heat up mid-batch.

Preproduction, top-of-production, inline, midline, final, and pre-shipment audits catch different classes of drift.

Calipers, gauges, scales, lux meters, tension testers, and microscope checks feel tedious until returns spike on one seam type.

Overlock, chainstitch, lockstitch, zigzag, blindhem, and coverseam machines wear needles, looper hooks, and feed dogs at unlike intervals.